Copyright (c) 2010 FabFilter Software Instruments http://www.fabfilter.com/forum.php en Latests posts in FabFilter's public support forum info@fabfilter.com Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:42:24 GMT Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:42:24 GMT http://www.fabfilter.com/ ../images/logo.gif 31 88 FabFilter.com http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1068#comment0 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:42:24 GMT Dear FabFilter, As i work with Cubase I would like to use FabFilter Pro-C as a SideChain Compressor. Somehow i could not get it done. I followed these steps: 1. Create a Group Channel track with Quadro configuration (in the More... menu). 2. Open the VST Connections window. In the Group/FX tab, locate the group bus you just created and right-click it to create child buses for the Stereo and Stereo (Ls Rs) parts. 3. In the Mixer, insert FabFilter Pro-C (SC) in the group ... http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1031#comment3068 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:04:15 GMT Can you tell us if you're using Live on Windows or Mac, and if on Mac, with the AU or VST version of Pro-C? Thanks! http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1031#comment3067 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:38:36 GMT We've experienced various problems lately with different versions of Live, and they all turned out to be bugs in Live, so I suspect this is another one. I wouldn't know how a plug-in could enter the amount of automation data you describe anyway, so it has to be a bug in Live. We'll investigate it and report it to Ableton. Cheers, http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1031#comment3066 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:59:55 GMT This is a problem that I am having as well, with the Pro-C (up to date) and the Simplon (up to date). So far none of the other plugs are having this problem. Another very serious associated problem is that upon exporting in Live 8.1.1, occasionally automation is completely bypassed upon hitting the final "OK" that initiates that actual export. It requires me to hit the "back to arrangement" button to re-automate. It is becoming so annoying that I don't want to use these plugins that I've ... http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1067#comment3065 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:29:52 GMT Absolutely, minimalism is the key! That said, there are a lot of things that can be done to increase versatility without cluttering the UI. In fact, some aspect could even be simplified further than they already are. http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1067#comment3064 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:39:26 GMT We'll think about it, but we're careful with adding new features to FabFilter One because we don't want to change its simple nature by adding too many new options... Cheers, http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1065#comment3063 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:36:34 GMT Thanks for the request, we'll think about it! :-) Cheers, http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1067#comment3062 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:37:08 GMT I'm also a big fan of One, and even though I recently bought Twin 2, I still find myself reaching for One more often. It's so much easier to come up with any sound you imagine (considering One's toolkit of course). So, yeah, there are some things that I miss. I'd love a sub-oscillator and a few more filter modes. I don't know if Raw and Tube would be right though, as Mathias suggest, because they have the rough character of the original One filter. Perhaps some of the cleaner and gentler ... http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1067#comment3061 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:25:11 GMT Aha, note that I didn't call it FabFilter One 2.0! I was just sticking with the "FabFilter Twin 2" naming convention. Perhaps it should be called FabFilter One SuperModernSpecialPlus. As a fan of simplicity, what changes would you like to see in FabFilter One? http://www.fabfilter.com/topic.php?topic=1067#comment3060 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:42:23 GMT Hi Mathias, If you to Help -> About to your FabFilter One you can see that One is already at version 3.10 ;) But I do share your wishes and I would love a new version of FabFilter One with new features :)